![]() Here is a comparison of the ATTO disk benchmark values, which are getting updated with soon coming drives:Īnd here is an excerpt of the latest ATTO disk benchmark values for a better overview will be gradually replaced with latest drives:ĬrystalDiskMark also provides a balanced measurement of performance with different transfer sizes. The bar chart already contains a comparison to some SSDs and hard disks, where the Crucial MX500 2TB SSD is relatively low for ATTO. These ATTO Disk benchmark values are now compared with a small transfer of 32KB and a large transfer of 8192KB. Here is a screenshot of the ATTO Disk benchmark values (SATA3 AHCI): 0.5KB and reaches the maximum reading values of 550375KB with a transfer size of 128KB. With the Crucial MX500 2TB SSD, the reading speed (green) is already above the writing speed (red) from a transfer size of approx. These values are maximum ratings, which are different to the previously continuous transfer rate benchmarks, as this benchmark can be higher even with SSDs with a slower overall performance. The ATTO disk benchmark values gives a very good overview about the write and read rate on different file sizes. For better overview, they will be gradually replaced with latest drives: Here is a comparison of the AS SSD benchmark values, which are getting updated with new drives:Īnd here is an excerpt of the latest AS SSD benchmark results. At the time of testing, the Samsung 960 Pro 1TB M.2 NMVe SSD leads the AS SSD total score, followed by some more SSDs and before the MX200 1TB SSD the new MX500 SSD with 2TB capacity joins the rank. You can already see some SSDs compared to the Crucial MX500 2TB SSD, whereby the graphics is updated regularly with new SSD drives. The comparison of the AS SSD benchmark results is extended with each new HDD/SSD test. Here is a screenshot of the AS SSD copy benchmark results (Crucial MX500 2TB AHCI AMD test setup): Here is a screenshot of the AS SSD benchmark values (Crucial MX500 2TB AHCI AMD test setup):Īnd here is another screenshot of the AS SSD iops results (Crucial MX500 2TB AHCI AMD test setup): ![]() Here is a screenshot of the AS SSD benchmark values (Crucial MX500 2TB AHCI Intel test system):Īnd here is another screenshot of the AS SSD iops results (Crucial MX500 2TB AHCI Intel test system): The Crucial MX500 2TB achieves 1167 points, which however is just below the 1206 points of the Samsung SSD 860 Evo and the 1203 points of the Samsung SSD 860 Pro on the Intel test system. The Crucial BX200 480GB SSD was only 731 points on the same test system, but the Crucial MX500 1TB SSD was slightly higher at 888 points.įor a better comparison with the previous Samsung SSD 860 Pro and Samsung SSD 860 Evo SSDs that didn’t run properly with the AMD test system, we also tested the Crucial MX500 2TB again with the Intel test system. The overall score of 871 points is pleasantly high, at least for the somewhat older AMD test system, which we have been using since the beginning of our SATA SSD tests to be able to provide a 100% comparison of the SATA SSDs. With the Crucial Storage Executive Tool you can adjust the over provisioning area as mentioned before and thus determine yourself how high you want to set the SSD durability vs. The usable capacity of the Crucial MX500 is 1863.01 GB. ![]() With the 2000GB Crucial drive a high sequential read and write speed could be achieved in the AHCI. For example, the benchmark program simulates a typical program start. By the way, 4K means that small 4K blocks are read or written and with 4K 64Thrd this is distributed to 64 threads at the same time. The AS SSD benchmark values provide a very good indication of the maximum possible read and write speed, the speed for smaller files and their respective access time. The SSD drive speed was examined and compared with the following benchmark software: Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate Edition and Windows 10 Enterprise Edition 64-bit are currently used as operating systems. The test results for SATA3 drives will be compared with an ASRock 890GX Extreme3 motherboard and the test results for mSATA and M.2 modules will be done with an ASRock Z270 Taichi motherboard. Let us now turn to the benchmark results. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |